Danny over at Twitter made the following claim:
If you didn’t ignore the context of John 6, you’d understand Jesus was speaking spiritually and metaphorically.
I respond:
… Read the restDanny’s claim that John 6 is symbolic or metaphorical is common among Protestants, but let’s unpack it with some Scripture and logic. First, the heart of the debate is John 6:51-58, where Jesus says things like, “I am the living bread that came down from heaven… the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh,” and “Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life.” Danny argues this should be taken metaphorically, but does that really hold up when we look at the context?
1. Jesus’ Audience Took Him Literally Notice how the Jews react in John 6:52: “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” They clearly took Him literally. If Jesus was just speaking symbolically, He could’ve clarified. Instead, He doubles down, getting even more graphic by saying, “My flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink” (John 6:55). In fact, when His own disciples grumble in verse 60, “This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?” Jesus doesn’t backtrack. He doesn’t say, “Wait, guys, I meant this symbolically!” He lets them walk away. If His message was just symbolic, why didn’t He clarify? Instead, He challenges them even more!
2. “Spirit and Life” Doesn’t Mean “Symbolic” Danny might point to John 6:63, where Jesus says,